TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
I wouldn’t, considering you raised UTG. Hard to see V calling with a lot of worse hands, and I do think better can be in his range.
Look at what happened with the sizing here: you bet roughly 40% pot on flop and turn, and now find yourself left with 75% pot on river. Better to structure that a little differently so that your bets are closer in size. With his exact hand and run out, I might even bet 2K on flop and then jam turn. But I definitely think flop should be larger one way or the other. I mean, wouldn’t you want to bet more here with AA/KK/99 (you should)?
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
You’re right that a larger bet narrows your opponent’s range. For your potentially one-and-done bluffs (like this one, when you don’t improve on turn) that’s a good thing. For your value hands, it isn’t necessarily, but putting more money into the pot is.
I don’t think you should be c-betting your entire range here, which is part of the case for having a larger bet size: you should be polarized when you bet anyway. I mean, betting 88 or 87s would be pretty bad I think.
As for the split you propose, it depends on what you mean by “bet small”. If you have in mind something like what you did here, you still run into the problem of having some hands in that range that want to play a larger pot and up having to do it with a river shove that is not too hard to play against. Why do you want to have a bet small range? What are the hands that you want to bet but don’t think you can bet profitably for, say, 1750?
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
Interesting, thanks for doing this. What % of pot is the river shove? For better or worse, I think there are a lot of opponents who prefer check-shoving rather than check-call-checking on the turn when there is only like 50% pot or something left in stacks. That might overall be good for us (gives a lot of leverage to our weak bluffs), but isn’t so good when we have big draws like this one, where we want to be the ones making the last bet.
Also, I know I’m the one who brought up flop sizing in the first place, but from some work I’ve seen on GTORB, c-bet sizing actually doesn’t tend to have a big effect on EV as long as you choose the right range. So, you should be more polarized when you bet larger, but a bigger/more polarized c-bet won’t be much better or worse than a smaller, merged one.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
105 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1