View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
big109 10before itm facing 42BB squeeze whats his range?
florianm1
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 588
Member Since:
June 11, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 20, 2013 - 4:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

title says it all

i was 39/37, he was 23/15 with 14% 3bet

 

Poker Stars $100+$9 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t350/t700 Blinds + t85 – 9 players – View hand 2242212
TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter

Tricoloren (CO): BB = 11.8, t8239
ciaca21 (BTN): BB = 70.4, t49252
pambur170 (SB): BB = 43.0, t30068
jus2awsum (BB): BB = 20.5, t14372
krilan1 (UTG): BB = 79.9, t55933
general_jim3 (UTG+1): BB = 9.5, t6644
ulan2009 (UTG+2): BB = 32.1, t22501
MARCIN123 (MP1): BB = 51.2, t35856
Hero (MP2): BB = 49.7, t34800

Pre Flop: (t1815) Hero is MP2 with 9 of diamonds 9 of hearts
4 folds, Hero raises to t1400, 1 fold, ciaca21 calls t1400, pambur170 raises to t29983 all in, 1 fold, Hero ???

p1kZoR
Wiesbaden, Germany
Small Stakes Grinder
Members
Forum Posts: 99
Member Since:
February 3, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 21, 2013 - 1:31 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

77-JJ? AQ-AK… Hard to say, it could be pretty everything (except absolut nuts like QQ-AA)

Juni0r83
South Australia
Grinding Micros
Members
Forum Posts: 60
Member Since:
November 14, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 21, 2013 - 7:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

There really are just two options here, and which one really depends on how the v sees you. 

 

1) Medium holding doesn't want action (maybe as low as 55, or 66 through to about 99 or TT, KJ, AT, etc, etc). He would play this if he thinks you're tight. Everything of higher value would be a flat or 3-bet and see a flop.

 

2) The absolute nuts (KK, AA, maybe QQ). He would play this way if he thinks that you're a solid player with a good feel for the game. He would therefore know that you know he wouldn't play this way with a nutted hand, and therefore you're more likely to call. It's only really second level thinking, so its not like this is really all that far out there. If we really wanted to, we could play this back on a third and fourth level thinking, but I expect we're just leveling ourselves at that point.

 

But in the end, once you put it through ICM, I expect it'll come out as a fold…

Van H3Lzing
Playing Freerolls
Members
Forum Posts: 17
Member Since:
May 30, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 21, 2013 - 9:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Often this is a hand like 99+, aq ak making it look weak/just trying to take it down without showdown but I would put my money on AK.

 

His range is not weak because its on the bubble and he has a 70 bb flatter to contend with.

rivermen123

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 339
Member Since:
June 14, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 21, 2013 - 3:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

This is a fairly gameflow-dependent spot. I think I just laugh and fold unless you've owned him recently and think he might be getting tired of you. Against a random it's a snap fold imo.

(But I've yet to escape the US so I haven't played on Stars in 2 years.)

packallama
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 176
Member Since:
August 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 21, 2013 - 4:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I agree with rivermen. I have seen players show up with QQ+ so many times in this spot on Merge. I snap fold  and tank with JJ without history.

CCuster 911
Delaware

TPE Pro
Forum Posts: 187
Member Since:
September 28, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
June 22, 2013 - 7:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Juni0r83 said:

 

2) The absolute nuts (KK, AA, maybe QQ). He would play this way if he thinks that you're a solid player with a good feel for the game. He would therefore know that you know he wouldn't play this way with a nutted hand, and therefore you're more likely to call. It's only really second level thinking, so its not like this is really all that far out there. If we really wanted to, we could play this back on a third and fourth level thinking, but I expect we're just leveling ourselves at that point.

I want to point out a flaw in this thinking, in case people try to use this.  What you are claiming here is that he is trying to take the top of his range and disgusise it as the middle of his range(your 1st point).  The problem is if you do this, you are not making a big enough jump(hence why majority of the time Ia ragne is balanced with nuts/air).  Nobody expects the guy to be bluffing, so adding the top of your range in this spot isnt gaining you value, and will 90% of the time cost you a decent amount of value.  

 

This is becuase the hands you are getting called by are great hands, that a majority of the time will be getting it in with you anyway.  The reason people shvoe ehre instead of 3 betting their medium hands is because they want to eliminate some of the light playbacks and the calls pre that make playing OOP hard(moreso that they are just uncomfortable playing it post OOP).

 

The hands you ae getting to call this shove are effectively 99+,AK for a lot of people, and you are getting those in anyways as they are likely 4 betting on you if you squeeze.

For Coaching - ccuster911@gmail.com - HH Reviews/Leak Finder(HEM or PT)/Concept Discussion

Juni0r83
South Australia
Grinding Micros
Members
Forum Posts: 60
Member Since:
November 14, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 23, 2013 - 2:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

CCuster 911 said:

Juni0r83 said:

 

2) The absolute nuts (KK, AA, maybe QQ). He would play this way if he thinks that you're a solid player with a good feel for the game. He would therefore know that you know he wouldn't play this way with a nutted hand, and therefore you're more likely to call. It's only really second level thinking, so its not like this is really all that far out there. If we really wanted to, we could play this back on a third and fourth level thinking, but I expect we're just leveling ourselves at that point.

I want to point out a flaw in this thinking, in case people try to use this.  What you are claiming here is that he is trying to take the top of his range and disgusise it as the middle of his range(your 1st point).  The problem is if you do this, you are not making a big enough jump(hence why majority of the time Ia ragne is balanced with nuts/air).  Nobody expects the guy to be bluffing, so adding the top of your range in this spot isnt gaining you value, and will 90% of the time cost you a decent amount of value.  

 

This is becuase the hands you are getting called by are great hands, that a majority of the time will be getting it in with you anyway.  The reason people shvoe ehre instead of 3 betting their medium hands is because they want to eliminate some of the light playbacks and the calls pre that make playing OOP hard(moreso that they are just uncomfortable playing it post OOP).

 

The hands you ae getting to call this shove are effectively 99+,AK for a lot of people, and you are getting those in anyways as they are likely 4 betting on you if you squeeze.

I see your point, and I would like to add, I wouldn't advocate this line with your nutted hands, just that there are players out there who do play like this, so it's always worth thinking about.

EatABagOfDonks
Flounder
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
May 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 24, 2013 - 10:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I don't know if his range here is necessarily as strong as everyone is saying. It really depends on what type of player he is, so it's hard to comment. But the fact that this is the bubble and your stats are so loose make this look like a really nice squeeze spot. If he's a good observant player, he could be doing this with as little as 55+, Ax. On the other hand, he could be a nit that just plays his cards and doesn't pay attention to your opening range. This is a $109 though, so I'd imagine a lot of guys are squeezing pretty light on the bubble. Against a good thinking player, I would seriously consider calling here. But maybe I'm just nuts.

DannyN13

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 305
Member Since:
August 3, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
June 26, 2013 - 2:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

99s+ AQs+. Not even close to a call unless you have a redic monkey like note on him. 40 bbs is plenty. Fold and move on and don't dwell on it.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
46 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Philbro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12007

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1