Foucault said:

I'm not sure what chip/jam means, but I would have used somewhat smaller sizing on all streets (except river). Your sizing is good against a player you know will be far too loose, and obviously it worked out for you here, but against even slightly better players I think you'll get disproportionately many folds to such large bets.

 With chip or jam, I ment to say shove turn, to avoid that V suck out on the river.

Cause all the times somebody calls 2 streets(flop&turn) postflop wit a flush draw this would mean that from math expectation we go busto ~33% of the time with our over-pair holding if we get to the river.

“Your goal shouldn't be to prevent Villain from calling large bets with hands that have ~16% equity. Yes, if you were to get all in on the flop, you'd lose about 33% of the time, which means that you'd more than double up about 67% of the time, and that's a pretty nice proposition.”

Thank you very mutch for your answer Foucault.

Obvious you look it from the bright side, and show me ho many times we winning, something like the glass is half full or half empty.

In this hand I convinced myself (after studying your “easy hand reading videos”) this guy was on somekind of a draw, and did not want to let suck him out on me, but now I understand that I have to be satisfied with the 67% double up.

Maybe this was also a menthal error to start thinking like that.