[table]ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
5,116,364,352 trials (Exhaustive)
[/table]
[table=head]Hand |Pot equity  |Wins |Ties 
axky|63.29% |3,078,601,164|319,009,248
ax, kt-kq, 22-AA|36.71% |1,718,753,940|319,009,248
[/table]

[table]ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
3,143,790,144 trials (Exhaustive)
[/table]
[table=head]Hand |Pot equity  |Wins |Ties 
axky|57.46% |1,693,309,632|226,460,328
at-ak, kt-kq, 22-AA|42.54% |1,224,020,184|226,460,328
[/table]

This might help you feel better about getting it in.

[table]ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
9,451,918,080 trials (Exhaustive)
[/table]
[table=head]Hand |Pot equity  |Wins |Ties 
k2x-kax, 22-aa, ax, kt-kq|33.01% |2,893,655,496|452,092,092
ak|66.99% |6,106,170,492|452,092,092
[/table]

suited king, all aces, kto-kqo, all pairs, 67% whee. yah i kinda think how people play this stack size depends heavily on the study habits of the person. when i first started really learning poker, i just spent a lot of time with pokerstove and paper, because most of what i dealt with was sngs and small field mtt final tables. <20bb's was like my only profit center. I think I even told someone once I was fine waiting and waiting to fold down to that stack size if my table was difficult just because i knew they'd fuck up at that stack. what's funny is i see people in cash game forum/threads talking about being in trouble spots against "short stackers" which is really like 50-100bb and they're all like 300-500bb deep. in my mind, it's all a bunch of math and you can learn study it for a while and find a ton of value, especially at lower stakes. my guess is at higher stakes, people are more likely adept at the size, at least what becomes profitable and not profitable. but yah youll see people fold too often or shove not often enough, or some will call too often and still not shove enough. i once saw a guy fold and fold and fold with 15bb and then finally snapped blind vs blind vs a good player and tabled 87o.