My wife was playing this hand and I “coached” (told) her to shove. I've run the hand through the TPE_EV_Calculator and at a villian call range of 10%, the play appears to be -EV. But it stills seems like a no-brainer shove given the situation. What does someone who has a brain think?
Full Tilt Poker $1 + $0.20 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t100/t200 Blinds – 5 players
TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter
twinkykiller76 (CO): t3810 19.05 BBs
Queen Maev (BTN): t2420 12.10 BBs
cj2701 (SB): t1105 5.53 BBs
brittanyrc (BB): t5035 25.18 BBs
rel1979 (UTG): t1130 5.65 BBs
Pre Flop: (t300) Queen Maev is BTN with A K
rel1979 raises to t400, 1 fold, Queen Maev raises to t2420 all in, 2 folds, rel1979 calls t730 all in
I'm playing around with this as well and it seems to be a -EV shove
Pot = 700
Your stack= 2420
BB=200
Effective stack= 1130 (We put the effective stack of our opponent we are 3bet shoving on right? Assuming everyone else in the hand folds even though the effective stack would change if they call)
Open Range %= 10
Opener Call %=10
(Based on his stack size and position can be pretty confident that hes calling his entire range that opens here so you should be called 100% of the time.)
Win %= 58
lose %= 42%
It appears that the EV of a shove is 2259 and EV of a fold is 2420 and the
NET EV of a shove = -161.
Is it because a 10% opening/calling range is so tight and doesn't include enough Ax rag combs that it makes -EV to shove here? Interested in finding out why this is a -EV shove because its a nobrainer shove for myself as well. I feel like im entering the data wrong somehow.
I'm not sure how you arrive at the above but it seems a +ev shove to me.
Consider the 3 possibilities (assuming no action from the blinds and that he never folds):
1.a You shove and win
This happens ~58% of the time if you stick to your assumed 10% range
When it does you pick up his 1130 plus the blinds of 300 so you end up with 3850.
1.b You shove and lose
You lose 1130 so you end up with 1290 (42% of the time)
So when you shove, on average you end up with (3840*0.58)+(1290*0.42) which by my reckoning is 2774
So a call is +354 ev
2. You fold
Your stack is unchanged so by definition this is 0 ev
Hence, easy shove. Hope this helps your wife to forgive you 🙂
Alternatively you can use a less rigorous mathematical approach: 12BB + AK = shove
emb
emb said:
I'm not sure how you arrive at the above but it seems a +ev shove to me.
Consider the 3 possibilities (assuming no action from the blinds and that he never folds):
1.a You shove and win
This happens ~58% of the time if you stick to your assumed 10% range
When it does you pick up his 1130 plus the blinds of 300 so you end up with 3850.
1.b You shove and lose
You lose 1130 so you end up with 1290 (42% of the time)
So when you shove, on average you end up with (3840*0.58)+(1290*0.42) which by my reckoning is 2774
So a call is +354 ev
2. You fold
Your stack is unchanged so by definition this is 0 ev
Hence, easy shove. Hope this helps your wife to forgive you 🙂
Alternatively you can use a less rigorous mathematical approach: 12BB + AK = shove
emb
Can't see not shoving here. With 12bb what other hand are you waiting for? If your waiting for AA-QQ you will probably blind down to nothing.
Not saying, just saying.
October 6, 2010
wilmont said:
Alternatively you can use a less rigorous mathematical approach: 12BB + AK = shove
lol love it (and i think you are 100% correct)
July 3, 2010
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
17 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1