View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
AK flop A in a safe board... are you ever folding?
chaos
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 132
Member Since:
November 18, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 26, 2016 - 8:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Honestly, I don’t see how this things happen to me (I mean in the sense of not being able to see them). Not because it’s strange, but because I’m unable to put the villain in any kind of hand given the way he is playing the hand. Are you ever folding in this spot?

Hand Conversion Powered by WeakTight Poker Hand History Converter
No Limit Holdem Tournament PokerStars
9 Players
$8.00+$0.80
Blinds 15/30 9
UTG tiprot 2,910
UTG+1 xJustAwesome 2,618
MP1 nukls669 3,159
MP2 Hero 3,390
MP3 danydodu 2,613
CO Domse000 3,020
D fabio_bruxo 2,955
SB DD_JAMES_SS 3,435
BB duoluo 3,000
Preflop
9 45 Hero is MP2 K A
2 folds, nukls669 raises to 90, Hero raises to 270, 3 folds, DD_JAMES_SS calls 255, 1 fold, nukls669 calls 180
Flop
3 840 A 5 6
DD_JAMES_SS bets 840, nukls669 folds, Hero calls 840
Turn
2 2,520 8
DD_JAMES_SS goes all-in 2,325, Hero goes all-in 2,280
River
2 7,125, 2 all-in 5
Final Pot 7,125
DD_JAMES_SS shows a full house, Fives full of Sixes 5 6
Hero shows two pair, Aces and Fives K A
DD_JAMES_SS wins 7,125 (net +3,690)
nukls669 lost 270
Hero lost 3,390
almofadinhas
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 586
Member Since:
June 2, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 26, 2016 - 9:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Mark that player as “lol way too much donk” and move on, really bad play by him.

As this goes he calls a 3bet oop, and dbet flop pot size, you can fold TPTK in this spot, buy i think is really hard to do, there is some ways people play really conservative, depend on reading too, donk as he is, when dbet pot otf you can think he has a set most of the time, maybe some weak aces, but i am not sure about that. Again, too conservative for me, I would play the same way.

The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 26, 2016 - 11:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Yeah…not sure there is much you could do here. 

Who knows what the hell he has?

I’d be looking at getting 2 streets of value here. Any more than that and I am wary. But considering he only gave you that in any case…

These players in my experience usually turn up with AQ or AT or MP GK.

Just take a note and thank your lucky stars this was only an $8.80 not the Main Event.

barra2088
Grinding Micros
Members
Forum Posts: 41
Member Since:
March 1, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 27, 2016 - 5:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I think you could find the fold button here on the turn.

When he called calls preflop i put villain on small pairs Ax hands, when he donks out for a pot bet i like the call to see if he slows down, when he jams the turn what range of hands do you put him on, this is never KK,QQ,JJ,TT,99, maybe sometimes an Ax but in that range he has A5,A6 that is also crushing you, i personally find the fold button here and say to myself i still have 75bb’s in this tournament, when you call you are often behind which you find you are here and hoping to hit, if he does have a set of 5′ or 6’s you get it in drawing dead.

You just have to note him and move on and have a good stack to build back up. Fun players don’t have many bluffs there and when he donks it gets even stronger, if he was a thinking player he would let you do all the betting and put you in on the river knowing you have a lot of strong A’s in your 3bet range. You also get 110bb’s in there and the only hand i could find myself getting it in for that much in this hand is AA,55,66,88 on the turn.

The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 27, 2016 - 9:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

testing testing 123…keep writing a post and getting access denied…really frustrating

The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 27, 2016 - 9:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Ok so its working.

Yes I in fact agree with barra on 2nd thoughts. It seems like a huge amount of bb’s to get in with top pair.

Which reminds me…I have a related question…

I do understand intuitively that getting top pair in when very deep is somehow way worse than when very shallow, but I couldn’t put it into words. Maybe its just because I’ve heard it so many times I know it to be correct. Can anyone explain it to me please? The board runs out the same when deep or shallow.

Is it because top pair is only a marginal hand, which when shallow it is less of an issue because you only have a little equity in the tourney? And when deep you have greater equity in the thing so its more of a problem getting it in with a marginal hand?

Or am I way out?

chaos
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 132
Member Since:
November 18, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
March 27, 2016 - 3:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

No, what you are talking about has to do directly with SPR. With a higher SPR 9-13, TPTK can be uncomfortable to play since we are no way committed to the pot and drawing hands get really good implicit odds against us. With an SPR 9-13 we are going to need 3 barrels to get all our stack in which gives a lot of implicit odds to drawing hands (i.e. set mining, flush draws, straight draws) that will likely get our full stack if the hit.

With small SPR we commit soon to the pot and thus drawing hands do not have odds to call. I.e. a small pair will have no odds to set mine if you had only 10-20BB since the total reward for the implied odds of actually hitting your set (1 out of 8) are not enough to justify set mining. The same thing happens with hands like suited connectors and similar.

At least that is my understanding of it. The concept itself if I recall correctly was initially brought up on the “Professional no limit hold’em” by Ed Miller (at least I think so).

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
March 27, 2016 - 4:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

It has to do with the risk-reward for both you and your opponent. When there is 3000 in the pot and 3000 in the effective stacks, you are each getting 2:1 to stack off, meaning you need only 33% equity and will both be correct to do so with a wide range. Your opponent will have incentive to stack off with many weakers hands, which means that you will probably be a favorite with a hand like TPTK when the money does go in. If there is 3000 in the pot and 30,000 in the effective stacks, then you are each getting 1.1:1 to stack off and need nearly 50% equity to do so. Consequently, you both need much stronger hands.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
13 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1