This is a pretty simple spot, but thought a theory discussion might be interesting.  It's the second hand of a 45man sng on tilt (these are much different than the Stars Turbo 45s for those who aren't familiar). I find myself 3 betting here about 80% of the time but was wondering if any of you ever flat this:

Argument for 3 bet:

We pick up the pot a ton

We get an extra chance at a fold w a cbet

We can get it in comfortably and if we win start the tourney w a nice advantage. 

Argument for flatting:

We push out a ton of hands we waffle crush when we 3-bet

When we 3-bet/get called. I don't think our cbet has a very high % of working. (If Villain pot/flats he def has something)

I think when we flat and hit we can often pick up a decent sized pot post.

I feel like 3-betting is the slightly better argument, but it's close to me. Also keep in mind the buy in.

Full Tilt Poker $69 + $6 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t15/t30 Blinds – 9 players

TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter

Daeniel83 (BTN): t1485 49.50 BBs

topoli550 (SB): t1440 48 BBs

savant111 (BB): t1500 50 BBs

Vinkyy (UTG): t1500 50 BBs

Sany Mizuki (UTG+1): t1500 50 BBs

Caml09 (UTG+2): t1500 50 BBs

Bruksta (MP1): t1740 58 BBs

got_air81 (MP2): t1500 50 BBs

POKERDUDEDAN (CO): t1335 44.50 BBs

Pre Flop: (t45) savant111 is BB with A K

5 folds, POKERDUDEDAN raises to t105, 2 folds, savant111 Flat or 3-bet????