When I get to this spot, I usually rely on the charts I made from Kill Everyone as a general guideline. If you've read Harrington on Holdem, he uses the variable M for the number of rounds you can survive before blinding out. Other books have different labels for this ratio, but basically you count up the cost of one round of blinds and antes (CPR=28K) and divide your stack (60K) by this amount. Kill Everyone calls this the CSI. Harrington called it M. In your example, your CSI is barely over 2 which as you said is very desperate.

Kill Everyone expands on Harrington's idea to takes into account the number of people who could call your shove. Their system multiplies the CSI (M) by the number of players left to act and calls it the power number. You are under the gun, so there are 8 potential callers. This makes your power number around 16. They lower the threshold by 5% if antes are in play, since you should be more aggressive in ante stages.

Lastly they assign a value for each hand based on its equity against calling ranges. If the hand value exceeds your power number, then you should shove. According to their math, the power number of 98o is 10, so they would advise you to fold. Their range for shoving in this spot would be {22+, A3o+, KTo+, QTo+, A2s+, K8s+ Q8s+, J8s+, 97s+, 87+}

In your case, there are a few factors that work in favor and a few factors that work against shoving more than optimal in this spot.

+You are UTG, they may perceive your range as a little tighter and call you less frequently

+There are few stacks over 10 BB, so calling and losing could hurt them significantly, so they may call you less than is optimal

– There's 8 players left to act. even if they call with top 10% of hands, there's only a 44% chance they will all fold.

– It's a $1 tournament, chances are higher that someone will make a loose call.

You don't mention where you are in the prize pool. People should call tighter if there are ICM factors which should let you shove a little looser.

Around blind defense, I would use a similar mathematical approach to construct a calling range. If you fold this hand you will have 5 BB.

The easiest case to consider is when one person puts you all in and everyone else folds. If you fold your hand, your stack size will be 4BB. So you need your expected stack size to be above 4 BB to make call +EV.

Assuming the raiser is not the small blind, the pot size if you call will be 11.4BB, so if your equity is greater than 35% (4/11.4) agasint villain's range you should call and if not you should fold.  

Next assemble what you think are reasonable, tight, moderate, and loose ranges for your villain and see which hands have 35% equity against each range.

If a hijack raise is moderately wide, say top 30% range of {22+, A2s+, K5s+, Q9s+, J8s+, T8s+, 97s+, 87s, 76s, A5o+, K9o+, QTo+} there are still plenty of hands that aren't profitable to call. For example the trashiest hands like 32o only have 30% equity. Even 85o is has 32% against this range. Q7o just missed my cut at 34.8%. Against this particular range, there are a number of hands where your better off folding. Remember that in tournaments, the chips you lose are worth more than the chips you gain, so erring on the side of caution when calling is best. 

When I tried this exercise, the calling range I got was {22+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J2s+, T4s+, 95s+, 85s+, 74s+, 64s+, 53s+, 43s, 32s, A2o+, K2o+, Q8o+, J8o+, T8o+, 97o+, 87o} which is only 50% of hands.  

However, an aggressive player in later positions can be raising much wider than 30%. Many cash game charts for the button I have seen are at 40% and with antes in tournaments it should be even wider. 

Here is a wide 62.5% range {22+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J2s+, T3s+, 94s+, 85s+, 76s, A2o+, K3o+, Q4o+, J5o+, T6o+, 97o+, 87o} Still against this range one 1/8 of hands don't have 35% equity. The calling range I got was {22+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J2s+, T2s+, 92s+, 82s+, 73s+, 63s+, 53s+, 42s+, A2o+ K2o+, Q2o+, J2o+, T4o+, 96o+, 86o+, 76o, 65o, 54o},