Seems the consensus is this is bad lol. Well, I suppose I should lay out my reasons for taking this spot in this manner to be critiqued now that we've talked it out a bit.

If you see, it's the 14.5bb stack in the cut off's very first opportunity to raise when folded to and he's chosen to minraise. Our button is loose, but hasn't been crazy, in our two orbits. It being the cut offs first opportunity, I think his range can be a few things-

Here's 32.43% (22+, A2s+, K5s+, Q7s+, J8s+, T8s+, 98s, A5o+, K9o+, Q9o+, J9o+, T9o)
Here's 25.55% (55+, A2s+, K5s+, Q7s+, J8s+, T8s+, 98s, A7o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo, T9o)
Here's 20% ( 66+, A4s+, K7s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T9s, A9o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo)
Here's 13.88% (77+, A8s+, K9s+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KJo+, QJo)

Button flatting, combined with how he's played thus far, tells me he's almost certainly capped, removing AQ+, JJ+. I think button is flatting most of the time here with a wide speculative range because he's the button. 

I'm risking 899 to win 1999, (I raise 899 to 1099, and the total pot is 1999), needing a success rate of 45% or a combined fold of 55% to net profit without cards. Right off the bat I want to point out that if cut off goes with a range as wide as (55+, AT+, KJ+; 11.76%), I need 27% equity against that. If he shoves, the pot is 4572 and it costs me 1774, meaning I need 27.95% equity to break even. 

Okay back to the cut off. If his range is 32.43% and he goes with the 11.76% I outlined, he's folding ~64% of the time. If he shoves tighter (22+, AJ+; 9.5%), he's folding ~71% of the time.

If his range is 25.55%, he's folding ~54% of the time or ~63% of the time.

If his range is 20% he's folding ~41% of the time or ~52.5% of the time.

If his range is 13.88%, he's probably getting it in nearly always or folding around 20-25% of the time. Things are looking pretty slim and this would be incredibly dependent on him being a villain who has a wide steal range from the cut off (something I don't think is that difficult to give to an unknown player off this stack size at 100/200)

Button, while getting a price of 2.85 to 1, I think is just going to be out of line here too often and will fold. If he calls, the pot's 2698 and he should know he'll face a bet fairly often when he himself will only have a stack of 3651 behind. IF he calls, he's playing fit or fold and my cbet itself will almost always be profitable outright because he'll miss too often. If button folds 100%, my problem rests solely on cut off's range. If button folds 100%, a cut off who opens first in for 30% is folding too much, a difference as high as 5%. If button calls, I cbet 100% for 1/2 and he folds 2/3 (he misses), meaning the cbet is null. If called on cbet, I give up (he also shoves over cbet the 1/3 he hits Im guessing, these would be the same thing as I give up if called). I cbet 1/3 and he continues 1/3 of the time getting 4-1 and nets me a profit just by folding too much there. 

I want it understood I know my hand has no post flop playability. However, in this spot, I am completing a large % of the time because it is a low variance spot where I only need to realize 15.38% equity to break even. Because this hand has no playability to complete, despite good odds, I think I need (or want to find, rather) a 3bet/fold range if I think they will fold too often. This will allow me to also 3bet say like half AK and half QQ+ and shoving or 3betting bigger with a different range. Or, if I just go postflop for a low variance pot with a huge range, I can choose to 3b/fold trash like this and monsters, and only have this sizing. I understand it would be nicer if I had a hand like 89s, but that hand also plays well for a flat in that spot. If I 3b a hand like A2o, I have to call the cut off shove when he goes with it. If I 3b 89s, I really have to call. I'd much rather 3b/fold if he's folding too much.

And lastly, I think a villain raising at his first opportunity in the cut off for a minraise with 14.5bb on bovada is less likely to include 77-AA/AJ+ as most of these guys just shove strong hands at these sizes. That would make his opening range more combos of hands that fold to a 3b. He didnt type a number in, he just clicked raise when it folded to him. That's very easy to do. 

All of this said, I wanted to hold off on posting those points until we got comments coming. I quickly checked before 3b to see what price I'd get if I was shoved on, and then had a rough idea where my equity stands against pairs+bigger aces and what not, knowing it cuts pretty close. I noticed the cut off's stats. I noticed the button. I know people are cally overall, but look at what we have. The cut off can't call. The button can call, but his stack is heavily leveraged. I'm tired so I hope this doesn't come off rambly or defensive of bad play or results-oriented thinking. I love the idea of discussing things forward. Let's get the critique going.

regarding the 27.95, I’m confused how you mean I’m wrong lol. If the pot is 4575 and we’re facing 1774. Were getting 2.577 to 1, needing 27.96% to break even with 4 sig figs.You just rounded to 2.5 instead.

I appreciate it! I have no experience with crev, and really want to see what you can do with it.

Since I want to think about this spot in a manner where it’s the minimum for it to be profitable, let’s give cut off an opening range of
35%, a continuing range of 22-AA AT-AK KQ (158/1326 or 11.92%) and I honestly don’t think he’s ever calling, so all continuing is shoving. That’ll be my assumption. Also, because it’s really close and I’d fall to 16.5bb if I lose when the cutoff shoves, Id fold. Id want like 3% I think (random number i’m grabbing) to take that.

I also don’t think button is calling because of his stack and the pot size. Let’s give him a range of A2s-ATs, 78s-89s-9Ts-TJs-JQs, QJo, KQo, KJo, K9s, KTs, KJs, KQs 22-88, ATo, AJo. I’m tired but what’s that? (just checked 180/1326 or 13.57%) Now facing a 3b, idunno folding all but AJo/ATs/KQ/88? that’s 38/180 or 21% so calling 21% i guess? then that’s folding when it misses. 88 folds most flops id think (can you check flopzilla to see how often that is below top pair?), High cards aren’t calling a flop cbet when they miss, so I still feel a cbet at that stack size and pot size will be profitable all on its own as well, almost regardless what his range is postflop (because he won’t get to the flop with a strong tight range, he may get there with a weak tight range if he calls preflop far more often) I think this stack depth really drives it home.