View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
WSOP main vs WCOOP main
bingocome
Playing Freerolls
Members
Forum Posts: 11
Member Since:
July 29, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 29, 2014 - 7:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

This gotta be the perfect forum for this topic 🙂 unless it has been discussed before, if so pls point me to the rigth direction.

I just played my first WSOP main event and I can see why everybody say it is the best live tournament. Now with the wcoop coming up, I wonder how is the online main event compares with WSOP main? 

I found some article online comparing the two but it only mentioned # of participants / prize pool that kind of stuff..I am more curious with things like ROI, structure, variance, etc… I wonder if there are guys here that have experience with both can shed some light on these topics or any other interesting comparsion come to your mind. Thanks! 

bennymacca
Adelaide Australia
Road Gambling with Doyle
Members
Forum Posts: 2616
Member Since:
October 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 29, 2014 - 8:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

i havent played either, but i would have thought the ROI would be infinitely less in the WCOOP main than the WSOP main.

Avatar
Killingbird
Cary, NC

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 4582
Member Since:
April 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 30, 2014 - 1:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

bennymacca said:

i havent played either, but i would have thought the ROI would be infinitely less in the WCOOP main than the WSOP main.

I would agree with this, but have to stipulate than I have also never played the WCOOP main.

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
July 30, 2014 - 11:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Variance and ROI are both going to be higher in WSOP simply because of more people playing the tournament. Variance is absurd on both though because they are huge fields. Overall the WCOOP is certainly the tougher tournament, though it's still a great value for a $5K with plenty of satellite winners and what not.

bingocome
Playing Freerolls
Members
Forum Posts: 11
Member Since:
July 29, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 31, 2014 - 8:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks Andrew.. I guess even the online rec player who qualified from satellites are still better than the live rec players in wsop Main? Although you guys didn’t seem to consider the time factor – if it only take a fraction of time to play an online tourney, then that may compensate for your ROI.. It might be interesting to do a study comparing the structure deepness of these two tournies factoring the difference in # of hands play per hour , tho I would imagine Wcoop main is fairly deep too since it is the main event and Pokerstar should know a few things about tourney structure.

bingocome
Playing Freerolls
Members
Forum Posts: 11
Member Since:
July 29, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 1, 2014 - 3:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

sorry I just realize that duration shouldn't affect the ROI, but it does affect the hourly rate. I have to think the WCOOP main hourly should be higher if it only cost 1/3 time on avg? obv variance is still a bitch and prob higher online because of the competition and aggressiveness… I heard story that good player bought a scoop package and didn't cash once 🙁

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
August 1, 2014 - 10:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks Andrew.. I guess even the online rec player who qualified from satellites are still better than the live rec players in wsop Main? Although you guys didn’t seem to consider the time factor – if it only take a fraction of time to play an online tourney, then that may compensate for your ROI.. It might be interesting to do a study comparing the structure deepness of these two tournies factoring the difference in # of hands play per hour , tho I would imagine Wcoop main is fairly deep too since it is the main event and Pokerstar should know a few things about tourney structure.

Yeah the online players are probably better but also there just aren’t as many of them. Basically all the best players at WSOP play WCOOP plus some (people not 21, people in countries without tax treaties with US), but not all the same rec players play.

Yes there is more time and expense involved in playing a live tourney, but the buyin is also twice as large.

Really there’s not a lot of reason you’d have to choose between the two unless you are taking a single shot primarily for the experience, in which case you should definitely go for WSOP.

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
August 1, 2014 - 10:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

bingocome said:

sorry I just realize that duration shouldn't affect the ROI, but it does affect the hourly rate. I have to think the WCOOP main hourly should be higher if it only cost 1/3 time on avg? obv variance is still a bitch and prob higher online because of the competition and aggressiveness… I heard story that good player bought a scoop package and didn't cash once 🙁

A better structure (more hands/level) will mean better ROI for the better players and more negative ROI for everyone else. Variance isn't technically a function of win-rate, but a smaller edge does mean greater likelihood of a losing streak and risk of ruin, which is what most people are really worried about when they talk about variance.

bingocome
Playing Freerolls
Members
Forum Posts: 11
Member Since:
July 29, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
August 1, 2014 - 1:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Foucault said:

bingocome said:

sorry I just realize that duration shouldn't affect the ROI, but it does affect the hourly rate. I have to think the WCOOP main hourly should be higher if it only cost 1/3 time on avg? obv variance is still a bitch and prob higher online because of the competition and aggressiveness… I heard story that good player bought a scoop package and didn't cash once 🙁

A better structure (more hands/level) will mean better ROI for the better players and more negative ROI for everyone else. Variance isn't technically a function of win-rate, but a smaller edge does mean greater likelihood of a losing streak and risk of ruin, which is what most people are really worried about when they talk about variance.

Yea, I guess my main reason to bring this topic up is to decide whether it is make sense to travel abroad to play WCOOP or go play some live tourney instead, also the bankroll concern based on the winrate/variance difference.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
46 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Philbro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12007

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1