[Total: 18 Average: 8.6/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2
Concepts In This Video: 3-Betting • 4-Betting • Aggression • Bet Sizing • Blind vs Blind • Bluffing • Bubble Play • C-Betting • Deep Stacks • exploiting tendencies • Final Table • Final Table Bubble • Flatting • Floating • Fold Equity • Hand Reading • High Stakes • ICM • Implied Odds • Large Fields • Late Stages • Math • Poker Stars • Popular Online Series • Position • pre-flop • Ranges • Reads • Restealing • Showdown Value • Single Table • Table Dynamics • Theory • WCOOP
michae1di11on
Great series as usual. Idea for the next series could be following your “getting paid” series with a series on bluffing? Basically using the same hand reading techniques for good spots to bluff and when not to do so. Focusing on bet sizes too. Just an idea
loxxii
I like how you took the time to say what you thought their ranges should be in hands where you were not involved. Great series Andrew.
One Eyed Mule
How good is this series plenty of information to think about.
Foucault
Thanks for the kind words everyone. Michael, you may well see something like that in the future, but my next series is about heads up MTTs!
lapp3r30
Awesome series! You’re right in that you have an effective teaching style too… wp!
piefarmer
AB,
Not sure you can do a series on this, but I am interested in understanding proper bet sizing in various situations.
Keep up the good work.
michae1di11on
Sounds good. You were just saying on the podcast how important heads up play is in tournaments. That would be a great series too
Thisdogdonthunt
Thank you for the series. It is great.
At 27:22 you state that Jen is setting up the stack sizes for a river jam. Could you please explain?
Foucault
Thanks, glad you like it. I just mean that even though Jen’s bet seems small relative to the pot (only ~40%), stacks are shallow enough that she’ll be able to shove river for a reasonable percentage of the pot (~75%). Thus her opponent has to take into consideration not only whether he has the odds to call her current bet but also the risk that she she will shove the river.
Had the stacks been much deeper than they were, I’d be more inclined to take her small turn bet as a sign of weakness. With a huge hand, she’d want to try to get stacks in by the river, and that would require putting in more on the turn. Thus, to voluntarily bet such a small fraction of the pot on the turn would suggest that she didn’t want to play for stacks.
cliffvettej
Andrew, not all great players are great teachers. That is not a problem with you. You have a very understandable teaching style, one that a person can actually learn and retain various lines from. Thank you! BTW, jenbizzle is a guy from England which I’m sure you would know by now.
folding_aces_pre_yo
Hey andrew, just wanna congratulate you on your deep run , think you played very well and also learned a lot in this series 🙂