Big $33 Hand History Review with Jase Regina (Part 1)
[Total: 6 Average: 3.2/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
Concepts In This Video: 3-Betting • C-Betting • Early Stages • High Stakes • HUD • Limping • Mid Stages • Pokerstars • Post-flop • pre-flop • WCOOP
dropsk
Hey Jase.
Thanks for the video.
At 2.40 min with the A7s hand you said that if he made it 3x you would be inclined to peel, don’t you think by peeling here you are going to put yourself in a lot of tough spots because A7 is a hand that is dominated by some part of his 3 bet bluffing range and also doen’st play that well pre on this stack depth?
Thanks and great video.
dropsk
I meant doesn’t play well post.
SSSMforlife
Thanks for the question, dropsk. First of all, I’m not sure this is the best spot to include too many hands that dominate A7 in a 3bet-bluff range. The reason is because we get in a very dicey spot when we get 4b jammed on with hands like AJo or ATs, etc. at 30bb effective. I would tend to make my 3 bet range a bit more polar here, obviously including all the hands were willing to get in vs opener. Something like 99+, AK, AQs (56 combos) to get in and A2s-A5s,KJo, QJo J9s, 89s, 87s, 67s (56 combos) is a decent, balanced range in this spot that considers blockers to 4bet shoves, and board coverage for when we get flat-called. Obviousely we want to adjust this range a bit depending on dynamics.
Not that most players will have this range, but A7s has 45.4% equity vs that and even vs a bluff range of AT, A9o, A5s, QJo, KJo, A7s has 39.1% equity. If villain 3bets to 1k, we’re getting 2.25-1, meaning we need around 30% equity. Of course, we’re not going to realize all equity most of the time but I think there’s enough of a buffer to justify a call for sure. Something I didnt mention in the video, is that although we’re getting exactly 2-1 with villian’s large sizing, I think his large sizing indicates a stronger, 3bet/call-heavy range, which A7 obviously does poorly against.