[Total: 45 Average: 9.2/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
Andrew Brokos Premiere Series – TPE Theory: Hand Reading (Part 4)
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
Muttley66
I’m British and don’t use words like awesome very lightly .. However, this series is AWESOME in the most fantastic way.
I was not going to renew my TPE subscription until i realised i’d miss parts 3 and 4 of this series if i didn’t !
Thank you so much Andrew .. helped my game no end !
Nqon
You keep on surprising, each video in this series has surpassed the previous, and the first one was excellent. So I think that pretty much sums up what i think about this one 🙂 Looking forward to your next video!
duggs
agree with Nqon, they just keep getting better, also i think you should plug your podcast at some point, makes for very good listening aswell.
gsiciliano
Once again, top-class video, wrapping up this great and very helpfull series. Congrats Foucault.
Faffy78
Welcome to TPE Andrew. I still have some of your Saavy vids in my folder and I’m lookin forward to great things from you
BrewHa
This was so great. In live tournaments I’ve been trying to place opponents on ranges, and struggled. This really simplifies it, especially the part about just taking out one of the 3 categories making a difference. Thank you so much !
Andúril
Very good video series! Do you have any tips for handreading at micro stakes or any videos that cover that? The assumptions like ”he would’ve bet if he had that” doesn’t always work if they don’t know what they’re doing.
Yagasmurf
would you ever consider going over hands from a live game where we can see and hear the players, but not know their cards until after the hand and do this same kind of analysis?
bothorsen
In the part of this video where you talk about turning a hand with showdown value into a bluff (15 minutes in), you could actually use the hand from a moment before (around 13 minutes in). In the previous hand, you call three streets with Ad3 on a 773TQddd board. This seems like exactly the bottom of your calling range here, except perhaps if you had 22. You could turn this one into a bluff and shove the river. It would be *very* hard for him to call with anything less than a 7. But I guess this play would depend on you knowing that he does thin value bets.
folding_aces_pre_yo
Great video , the A3s example, if we know that V is capable of betting very thin for value , do you think it’l be a good spot to shove on the river with the A3s? since we know V is capable of betting very thin , our pair of 3s is likely not to be good , so we can either fold or shove …in that situation? i also think if we were going to do this to often we may get exploited , but i guess we can balance our play with our stronger part of our range too? so yeah going back to that a3s example we may decide to jam w/ trips 7 if we had a hand like A7s, so that balances our play for the times when we don’t actually have a hand…
thoughts on this?
hbundy
This is the reason I joined TPE. I sampled this and several other free. Not that impressed with other discussions but this is superb. Hopefully I will find more like this as I explore your library
The Riceman
I will leave my wife for you Andrew and we can discuss poker happily ever after.
acesfull44
Great stuff bud!
StilFishy
Thank you Andrew, you explained this concept in a way that caused the proverbial click of the “light bulb” above my head. 🍻😊