$60 OPS Win Hand History Review with Daryl Jace (Part 7)
[Total: 3 Average: 10/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 8
Concepts In This Video: 3+4 betting • Carbon OPS • Final Table • Final Table Bubble • hand History • HUD • Late Stages • Merge Network • Post-flop • pre-flop • Ranges • river play
StYogi
On the 9Tss hands, did you give any thought to what you were representing? Imo it’s hard to see what made hands your opponent can realistically put you on: you’d likely bet sets and overpairs on such a wet board, if somehow you’ve got 75 he can assume you would have cbet. The 8 is very unlikely to have given you two pair.
To me the check flop, raise turn on 4628ds line looks pretty much like the hand you got – something that gained equity on the turn. I’d think a competent opponent would find a call or raise quite often with marginal holdings here.
On the other hand I appreciate arguments like his range likely being wide and ICM ties his hands with marginal holdings. But as the hand reading goes, I’m sceptical of the line.
Thoughts?