$10 Hand History Review with Andrew Brokos (Part 3)
[Total: 12 Average: 6.9/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2
Concepts In This Video: 3-Betting • C-Betting • hand History • HUD • Late Stages • low stakes • Mid Stages • Poker Stars • Post-flop • pre-flop • SCOOP • Single Table
Marcello
Andrew, this is a great series very grateful for you having made it! It was your awesome blog site that I first read when starting out, and used your book reviews to get a study guide for NLHE cash games. I’ve been watching your videos exclusively, specifically the Theory videos.
If you’re up in Canada to play the SCOOP, I would love if you entered another low stakes tournament to give further analysis.
Thanks again, take care.
Foucault
Thanks, glad you enjoyed! I’m not doing SCOOP this year but probably will do WCOOP…
Kingsfull
I really liked this series. I like how you don’t try and sugar coat your missteps. Good work. Looking forward to the next one.
Foucault
Thanks!
rbbeagles13
Thanks Andrew! Fantastic series. Been looking for a way to take higher stakes thinking and tips and apply to them to the lower stakes. I love it, and would love another one in the future!
markconkle
Great series, Andrew!
I like hearing about your thoughts, particularly as they relate to making adjustments based on small amounts of information about your opponents.
On the 35s suited hand around 26:00, you mention that the bluff could work more than half of the time and you would still be losing money. While that’s true for some bluffs, I think for such a good semi-bluff it’s not true here. When they both fold, you win 15,600 chips. If one player calls, you are either losing about 30,000 or winning about 41,000. Even if you only give yourself 25% equity when called, you are still losing less than 15,600 when called.